Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning (PjBL) Berbantuan Mind Map Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to test whether the use of a project based learning model assisted by mind maps has an effect on students' creative thinking abilities. The research sample consisted of 50 class A and B students using Shapiro Wilk. quantitative method with a Quasi Experimental Design and a Nonequivalent Pretest-Posttest control group design scheme. Data was collected through pretest and posttest to obtain the N-Gain Score value between the experimental class and the control class. with a sampling technique using a purposive sampling method. Data analysis was carried out using parametric statistical tests, namely the Anova Test. Data analysis results Based on the results of data analysis obtained during the research, it shows that the N-gain score for the experimental class got an average score of 80%, categorized as effective in using the project based learning model assisted by mind maps, while the control class got an average score of 21%, categorized as ineffective in using conventional learning. When testing the hypothesis using the ANOVA test, Sig 0.000 ≤ 0.05 was obtained so that there was a significant difference between the experimental class and the control class. Thus Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. So it can be concluded that there is a significant influence of the PjBL model assisted by mind maps on students' creative thinking abilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it