Optimalisasi Publikasi Guru di Era Merdeka Belajar: Kolaborasi MGMP dan Perguruan Tinggi dalam Penguatan Kompetensi Penulisan Ilmiah
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem of low teacher skills in writing scientific articles is a challenge in developing professionalism and fulfilling publication obligations for promotion. This Community Service Program aims to improve the ability of MGMP Accounting Central Jakarta 1 teachers in compiling scientific articles based on Classroom Action Research through structured training and intensive mentoring. The activity was carried out with a participatory approach through workshops, hands-on practice, and continuous online and hybrid consultations. The activity results showed a significant increase in participants' understanding of scientific writing techniques, with 80% of participants drafting articles and 30% ready to be submitted to accredited journals. Key recommendations include follow-up mentoring to the publication stage and establishing a teacher writers' forum to encourage collaboration and sustainability capacity building.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it