MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411534790 · doi:10.1186/s13059-025-03638-y

CellMemory: hierarchical interpretation of out-of-distribution cells using bottlenecked transformer

2025· article· en· W4411534790 on OpenAlexaff
Qifei Wang, He Zhu, Y. Hu, Yanjie Chen, Yuwei Wang, Guochao Li, Yun Li, Jinfeng Chen, Xuegong Zhang, James Zou, Manolis Kellis, Ting Li, Dianbo Liu, Lan Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsMcGill Genome CentreMcGill UniversityMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational University Health SystemChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBiologyHuman geneticsTransformerEvolutionary biologyInterpretation (philosophy)Computational biologyBiological systemStatistical physicsPhysicsComputer scienceGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Machine learning methods, especially Transformer architectures, have been widely employed in single-cell omics studies. However, interpretability and accurate representation of out-of-distribution (OOD) cells remains challenging. Inspired by the global workspace theory in cognitive neuroscience, we introduce CellMemory, a bottlenecked Transformer with improved generalizability designed for the hierarchical interpretation of OOD cells. Without pre-training, CellMemory outperforms existing single-cell foundation models and accurately deciphers spatial transcriptomics at high resolution. Leveraging its robust representations, we further elucidate malignant cells and their founder cells across patients, providing reliable characterizations of the cellular changes caused by the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome biologySame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207