Daily Activities and Social Participation Among Occupational Therapists Working with Older Adults with Neurocognitive Disorders: A Canadian-Wide Survey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim Activities of daily living (ADL) and social participation are key predictors of health outcomes in older adults with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) or related disorders. This study aimed to profile occupational therapy (OT) practice in using standardized ADL and social participation questionnaires among older adults with AD or related disorders across Canada.Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted nationwide among OTs working with older adults with AD. Participants were recruited through OT regulatory bodies and the Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists.Results A total of 183 OTs responded, with 41.53% assessing ADLs and 6.01% assessing social participation using standardized questionnaires. Barriers included the belief that these tools are unnecessary, lack of access, and time constraints. Most OTs relied on colleagues to select assessment methods.Conclusion Future research is required to improve accessibility to and practitioners’ knowledge of standardized ADL and social participation questionnaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".