MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modulation of the carotid baroreflex using a novel, low-cost, low-noise, MRI-safe variable-pressure neck chamber system

2025· article· en· W4411543130 on OpenAlexaff
Keenan Eiserman, Adam M.S. Luchkanych, Corey R. Tomczak, T. Dylan Olver

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaroreflexMedicineModulation (music)Biomedical engineeringBlood pressurePhysicsAcousticsInternal medicineHeart rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modulation of the carotid baroreflex can be performed in research, teaching, and clinical settings using variable-pressure neck chambers. However, there are only a small number of commercially available systems, which are expensive. Furthermore, most systems are not compatible with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as they contain metallic components or are too bulky to fit within the MRI bore. Therefore, the purpose of the present project was to develop a variable-pressure neck chamber system for less than $1500 USD using commonly sourced parts that are MRI-compatible. The components of our variable-pressure neck chamber system consisted of an AC/DC converter, diaphragm pump, timer, solenoid valves (S/V), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) pipe, swimming goggles, pneumatic kill switch, and voltage regulator, all sourced from common hardware suppliers or Amazon.ca. The assembled system fits on a 51 x 71 cm (20 x 28 in) table surface and weighs ~8 kg (~18 lb.). The sourced goggles (neck chambers) and pneumatic kill switch were made from plastic compounds, permitting safe use within an MRI. All supplies purchased to construct this system totaled <$1,200 USD. Solenoid valve position duration and cycle count (open-closed = one cycle) were programmed independently through the timer and wired to a trigger switch to enable users to easily adjust stimulus duration and frequency and activate the system with a single button press. Performance tests consisted of applying localized positive and negative pneumatic pressures (20 s stimulus duration) to the carotid sinuses through a range from +60 to -60 mmHg in steps of 20 mmHg. The data indicate our variable-pressure neck chamber system is capable of delineating a stimulus-response relationship for both the blood pressure (decrease: -6±1 mmHg, increase: 9±3 mmHg, range: -7 to 13 mmHg) and the heart rate (decrease: -9±2 bpm, increase: 12±3 bpm, range: -10 to 15 bpm) components of the baroreflex. Technical data reveal the system operates quietly (34.0±1.50 dB) and fast with an evacuation rate of 385±35 mmHg/s during suction application and 371±175 mmHg/s during pressure application. The present study demonstrates the successful development of a low-cost, low-noise, MRI-safe variable-pressure neck chamber system built with easily sourced parts. Future design iterations will achieve higher evacuation rates, greater portability, and integrate automated R-wave gated stimulus application. Funding: NSERC Discovery Grant (#05323) This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207