MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Orthostatic hypotension in precapillary pulmonary hypertension: prevalence, clinical profile and hemodynamic mechanisms

2025· article· en· W4411543136 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ivone L. Bonifacio, Patrice Brassard, Rudolf K.F. Oliveira, Eduardo Geraldo de Campos, Jaquelina Sonoe Ota Arakaki, Bruno M. Silva

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOrthostatic vital signsHemodynamicsPulmonary hypertensionCardiologyInternal medicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension (PreCapPH) is a rare condition that progresses with impaired right ventricular (RV) function due to elevated RV afterload. Current PreCapPH pharmacological treatments often produce undesirable systemic vasodilatory effects. Furthermore, patients with PreCapPH exhibit reduced arterial baroreflex sensitivity and effectiveness. Collectively, these factors may compromise the regulation of systemic arterial pressure in PreCapPH, particularlyin response to sudden postural changes such as transitioning from lying to standing. However, orthostatic hypotension (OH) has only been indirectly interpreted via the Valsalva maneuver in a small cohort of patients with PreCapPH. Furthermore, evidence from other patient groups shows that OH occurrence is often poorly correlated with resting systemic arterial pressure and may be asymptomatic in up to 50% of cases. These findings suggest that OH could be an underrecognized yet clinically relevant issue in PreCapPH. The present study, therefore, sought to: 1) investigate the prevalence of OH and its subtypes (initial, delayed, and sustained OH) in patients with PreCapPH; 2) characterize the clinical profile of patients with PreCapPH who experience OH and its subtypes; and 3) explore hemodynamic mechanisms underlying the different OH subtypes in this patient population. Sixty outpatients with PreCapPH participated in the study. OH was verified by an active standing maneuver. Beat-by-beat heart rate and arterial pressure were measured by electrocardiography and volume clamp finger photoplethysmography, respectively. Stroke volume (SV) was estimated from the arterial pressure waveform, and cardiac output (CO) and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were calculated considering heart rate (HR), SV, and mean arterial pressure data. Initial OH was defined as a decrease in systolic arterial pressure (SAP) or diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) exceeding 40 or 20 mmHg within the first 15 seconds of standing. Delayed OH was defined as SAP or DAP decreases greater than 20 or 10 mmHg within 30 to 40 seconds, and sustained OH was identified as SAP or DAP decreases exceeding 20 or 10 mmHg between 60 and 600 seconds. Thirty-one patients had some type of OH (i.e., prevalence = 51.6%), with 19 presenting more than one OH subtype. Among these 31 patients with OH, 23 presented initial, 18 delayed, and 13 sustained OH. No significant differences were found between patients with and without OH regarding sex, age, resting pulmonary hemodynamics, resting arterial pressure, medications, functional class, and aerobic exercise capacity (P > 0.05). HR, SV, CO, and TPR responses (% change from supine baseline) were not different between groups with initial OH and without OH from the beginning to the end of standing (P > 0.05). However, SV decay was greater in the group with delayed OH than without OH (-31 ± 21 vs. -19 ± 14%; P = 0.033). Additionally, TPR compensatory increase was attenuated in the group with sustained OH than without OH (-6 ± 21 vs. 7 ± 15%; P = 0.023). In sum, patients with PreCapPH frequently experience OH when transitioning from a supine to a standing position, with initial OH being the most common subtype. Notably, no specific clinical characteristic was associated with OH occurrence. Initial OH did not appear to result from a single, identifiable hemodynamic mechanism. In contrast, delayed OH was linked to an exaggerated SV decay, while sustained OH was associated with insufficient TPR increase. CAPES; FAPESP, Numbers: 17/17027-0, 22/12176-5; CNPq, Numbers: 307610/2022-5, 313284/2021-0; NSERC Canada; Foundation Institut Universitaire Cardiologie Pneumologie This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207