MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Regulation of cardiomyocyte pathological hypertrophy by Stress-inducible phosphoprotein I (STIP1)

2025· article· en· W4411543801 on OpenAlexaff
Fernando Araújo Espanhol, Anderson K. Santos, FERNANDO PAIVA MELO NETO, Iara Pastor Martins Nogueira, Itamar Couto Guedes de Jesus, Mário Morais Silva, Thiago Verano Braga, Vânia F. Prado, Marco A. M. Prado, Sónia Fonseca

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicVitamin C and Antioxidants Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphoproteinPathologicalMuscle hypertrophyBiologyCell biologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicinePhosphorylation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increased protein misfolded can contribute to the development of cardiac dysfunction, pointing to chaperones as potential guardians of heart function. Stress inducible phosphoprotein I (STIP1) is a co-chaperone that bridges Hsp70 and Hsp90, but its function in the heart is unclear. Here, we assessed the role of STIP1 in the heart in both healthy and diseased conditions. First, we investigated STIP1 protein expression in human cardiac samples from healthy and heart failure (HF) patients obtained from the Duke Human Heart Repository by Western blot. STIP1 is expressed in the human heart, and its levels are reduced in HF patients. To determine whether reduced STIP1 contributes to changes in heart function, we used a STIP1 haploinsufficient mice (STIP1 +/- ) with 50% reduction in cardiac STIP1 protein levels. Echocardiography evaluation showed that STIP1 +/- mice developed normally with no evidence of major cardiac alterations. Next, we evaluated the ability of STIP1 +/- mice to cope with myocardial damage induced by 7 days of Isoproterenol (ISO) treatment. Both wild-type (WT) and STIP1 +/- mice treated with ISO showed an increase in heart weight/tibia length ratio, however STIP1 +/- /ISO mice exhibited more pronounced inflammation and fibrosis. Strikingly, cardiomyocytes (CMs) isolated from STIP1 +/- /ISO mice did not grow in area, indicating that the organ-level hypertrophy observed in this group is likely due to fibrosis and inflammation. To establish a causal relationship between STIP1 levels and the process of hypertrophy, we transfected neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (NRCMs) with an siRNA against STIP1 mRNA and treated the cells with ISO (20µM) for 48h. The NRCMs transfected with STIP1-siRNA showed a decrease in 80% of STIP1 mRNA, as shown by qPCR and immunofluorescence. Mock CMs treated with ISO exhibited an increase in area, while STIP1-siRNA CMs showed no hypertrophy in response to ISO. To determine if the participation of STIP1 in the hypertrophic response extends to other hypertrophic pathways, we treated NRCMs with angiotensin II (Ang II, 100nM for 48h). Decreased STIP1 levels blunted Ang II hypertrophy. CM hypertrophy is characterized by increased protein synthesis, therefore to investigate whether STIP1 deficiency impairs protein translation, we used puromycin labeling of nascent peptides. Confirming our findings, CMs transfected with STIP1-siRNA did not increase protein synthesis rate in response to ISO. To assess the mechanism through which diminished STIP1 levels impair protein synthesis in response to ISO, we performed proteomics of cardiac tissue from WT and STIP1 +/- mice subjected to the in vivo ISO treatment. The ingenuity pathway analysis confirmed that the differentially expressed proteins detected in the STIP1 +/- /ISO heart were mainly related to adverse remodeling, including cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. A finding which is in line with the cardiac phenotype described for the STIP1 +/- mice treated with ISO. Analysis using the Reactome database revealed several dysregulated pathways related to proteins synthesis, including a downregulation of ribosomal proteins, initiation factors and components of mTORC1 pathway in the STIP1 +/- /ISO heart compared to WT/ISO. Our data reveals, for the first time, a critical role for STIP1 as a regulator of protein synthesis during pathological hypertrophy in cardiomyocytes. CNPq, CAPES, FAPEMIG, PRPq This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicVitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchFrench-language works237,207