MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411546076 · doi:10.2196/68937

Design and Evaluation of a Digital Health App (SingaporeWALK) for Active Aging: Pre-Post Intervention Study

2025· article· en· W4411546076 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huanyu Bao, S. Meena, Sai G. S. Pai, Navrag B. Singh, Kai Zhe Tan, Ben Tan Phat Pham, Feihong Pan, Yin Leng Theng, Edmund W. J. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Formative Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTechnology Use by Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintIntervention (counseling)GerontologyInternet privacyPsychologyComputer scienceWorld Wide WebMedicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The global trend toward population aging poses significant challenges for maintaining older adults' health and well-being, particularly in multicultural urban environments like Singapore. Despite the potential of digital health interventions, older adults face substantial barriers to technology adoption, including complex interfaces and culturally inappropriate content. Existing mobile health apps often fail to integrate physical, nutritional, and mental health components or accommodate the needs of multicultural older adult populations. Objective: To address gaps in mobile app design for older adults and bridge the digital divide, this research aimed to create and evaluate the SingaporeWALK (SGWALK) app, a culturally inclusive digital health solution promoting active aging through community-based interventions among Singapore's older adults. Methods: The SGWALK app was developed using participatory design methodology involving iterative testing with older adults to ensure appropriateness and usability. The app integrates 3 core components: exergames (Fruit Ninja, Piano Step, and Arctic Punch) aligned with Singapore's exercise guidelines for older adults, nutrition tracking based on local dietary recommendations, and mental well-being assessment using the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form. Following development, a 4-week pre-post intervention study was conducted with 48 participants (aged 60-85 y) randomly allocated to 4 conditions: conventional exercise, exergames only, exergames with health coach support, or exergames with peer support. In total, 5 wearable inertial measurement unit sensors captured movement data during weekly 30-minute supervised sessions at community centers. Primary outcomes included changes in physical activity metrics, technology acceptance, and mental well-being measured through pre- and postintervention assessments. Results: The 4-week intervention demonstrated significant improvements across multiple health domains. Physical activity measures showed a 6.5% increase in maximum acceleration (t47=3.82, P<.001), while nutritional tracking revealed steady improvements in healthy eating patterns throughout the intervention period. Mental health assessments indicated that participants classified as "mentally well" consistently outperformed the "moderate" group across physical activity measures. Technology acceptance showed substantial enhancement, with willingness to use health apps increasing from mean 3.18 (SD .79) to mean 3.95 (SD .82; t29=-3.63, P<.001), and perceived ease of use improving from mean 3.01 (SD .70) to mean 3.76 (SD .68; t29=-4.08, P<.001). Additionally, participants developed more efficient movement patterns over time and formed supportive social relationships during the community-based implementation. Conclusions: The SGWALK app shows promise for promoting active aging and reducing technology barriers among Singapore's older adults. The community-based implementation model, bilingual interface, integrated health monitoring approach, and sensor-based movement tracking offer potential advantages over existing solutions. These findings provide useful insights for researchers and practitioners developing digital health interventions for older adult populations in multicultural urban settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: Non-randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.514
Teacher spread0.399 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Formative ResearchSame topicTechnology Use by Older AdultsFrench-language works237,207