A Cross-Disciplinary, Quantum-Gravity Approach to Everything from Consciousness and Gravity to the Riemann Hypothesis and Topological Insulators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article adopts a cross-disciplinary approach and a theoretical universe which has been 100% unified by a Theory of Everything or theory of quantum gravity, so that every microscopic and macroscopic object and event in space and time is connected. Phenomena such as geometry, topological materials, electrons, phase transitions, Weyl and Majorana fermions are inextricably related to topics like consciousness, gravity, Wick rotation, the Riemann hypothesis, and the cosmos. It’s interested in expressing unfamiliar ideas that might lead to new knowledge concerning physics and mathematics. The article’s foundation is an approach called Vector-Tensor-Scalar Geometry which seeks, in scientific tradition, to build on a paper Albert Einstein published in 1919 when he was at the peak of his abilities, having completed his General Relativity Theory a mere handful of years earlier. From the foundation, our Ship of the Imagination - to use a phrase from Carl Sagan’s and Neil deGrasse Tyson’s “Cosmos” - launches into topics like the connections between topology (rubber-sheet geometry), time dilation, consciousness, the nature of gravity, the Riemann Hypothesis, Wick rotation, the Higgs boson and field, topological materials, the Weyl fermion, and the Majorana fermion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".