MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411553206 · doi:10.1021/acsestwater.5c00281

A Low-Cost, Open-Source, 3D-Printed, Compact, In Situ, Automatic Water Sampler for Environmental Surveillance

2025· article· en· W4411553206 on OpenAlexaff
Miao Wang, Canwei Pang, Baiqian Shi, Christelle Schang, Monica Nolan, Rachael Poon, Stephen Catsamas, Wenchang Zhu, David McCarthy

Bibliographic record

VenueACS ES&T Water · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersDepartment of Health and Human Services, State Government of Victoria
KeywordsOpen sourceIn situEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceChemistrySoftwareOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water sampling is crucial for assessing and managing urban water systems, and wastewater sampling has expanded applications for public health surveillance. This paper introduces an innovative, open-source, compact autosampler, “ MAD A uto- S ampler (MAD-AS)”, to overcome the significant cost, space, and installation limitations of conventional water automatic samplers. MAD-AS can collect samples from diverse water sources. The device integrates a 3D-printed peristaltic pump, protective housing, and an ATmega-based microcontroller for user-defined sampling programs. It can be installed in space-constrained areas, sits in situ within the waterway, and can be remotely triggered via cellular connectivity. Laboratory tests validated MAD-AS’s consistent performance, both regarding its pumping rate and its ability to sample complex water matrices with high pollutant variability. Field deployments ( n = 75) in stormwater and wastewater systems demonstrated comparable performance to traditional sampling methods, particularly for smaller or dissolved pollutants (TP, TN, viruses) with significant correlations ( p < 0.05). MAD-AS’s low-cost, easy installation with small batteries for power supply, and accessible design aim to enhance our temporal and spatial understanding of water quality variations across diverse catchments, including in remote and informal communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS ES&T WaterSame topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207