MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411554469 · doi:10.29169/1927-5129.2025.21.13

Numerical Simulation of a Turboprop Engine Inlet with a Bypass Channel

2025· article· en· W4411554469 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhenlong Wu, Yakui Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Basic & Applied Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRocket and propulsion systems research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science and Technology Major Project
KeywordsTurbopropInletChannel (broadcasting)Marine engineeringEnvironmental scienceMechanicsEngineeringComputer scienceAerospace engineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Turboprop aircraft may face a variety of harsh flight environments during flight, and various foreign objects may be sucked into the engine, among which the inhalation of sand can lead to erosion of the blades of the compressor. Such ingestion often results in compressor blade erosion, which can lead to engine surge and power loss. Therefore, this study explores the aerodynamic and sand separation characteristics of the inlet channel with a bypass channel through numerical simulation methods. ANSYS Fluent software is used to simulate the six-bladed propeller rotation based on the slip-grid technique by combining the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations (URANS) and shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model. A Lagrangian discrete phase model (DPM) is applied to track the motion of standard coarse sand. The focus is on analyzing the mechanism of different propeller speeds and scavenge ratio (SCR) on the separation efficiency (η).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Basic & Applied SciencesSame topicRocket and propulsion systems researchFrench-language works237,207