MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Fitness Guide With Mental Health Support Using Fitmind

2025· article· en· W4411556859 on OpenAlexaff
Sedighi Ali, Mohammed Zaid Burhan Surve, Neha Unnisa

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational jounal of information technology and computer engineering. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthPsychologyApplied psychologyGerontologyMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project delivers physical fitness and mentalwellness in today’s fast-paced lifestyle which hasbecome a crucial part of our life. While there arenumerous mobile and web applications addressingeither fitness or mental health, very few offer aholistic, intelligent, and integrated solution. The FitMind system is a comprehensive web-basedapplication designed to promote overall well-beingthrough the power of artificial intelligence andmachine learning. The platform provides three majorfeatures: a personalized Fitness Planner, a MentalHealth Tracker, and a Meditation & Wellness Advisor,all powered by robust ML models. The Fitness PlannerModule predicts a user’s fitness category based onpersonal parameters like age, BMI, activity level, andlifestyle habits, and recommends a suitable workoutplan and diet. The Mental Health Tracker Moduleleverages psychological screening scales like PHQ-9(Patient Health Questionnaire-9), GAD-7(Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and DASS-21(Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale) to assessmental health conditions, and provides tailored advicefor improving mental wellness. The Meditation &Wellness Module evaluates lifestyle parameters suchas sleep quality, screen time, stress levels, andmindfulness score, then suggests guided meditations,breathing techniques, and daily wellness tips.In addition, the system incorporates an AI-basedChatbot Module that uses natural languageprocessing (NLP) and a Naive Bayes classifier tounderstand user queries and offer instant responsesrelated to fitness, mental health, and meditation.Developed using Python, Flask, and MySQL, Fit Minddelivers an interactive and user-friendly experiencewith real-time recommendations and progresstracking.Overall, FitMind serves as a smart virtual wellnessassistant aimed at making mental and physical wellbeingaccessible, personalized, and engaging for allusers, especially students and working professionals.Its modular design also makes it scalable for futureintegration with wearable health devices and mobileplatforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0950.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational jounal of information technology and computer engineering.→Same topicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation→French-language works237,207→