MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411561625 · doi:10.3390/jrfm18070349

The South African Fear and Greed Index and Its Connectedness to the U.S. Index

2025· article· en· W4411561625 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Deevarshan Naidoo, Peter Moores‐Pitt, Paul‐Francois Muzindutsi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of risk and financial management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Foundation
KeywordsIndex (typography)Social connectednessPsychologyPolitical scienceSocial psychologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the cross-country spillover effects of investor sentiment, specifically Fear and Greed, between the United States and South Africa, within the broader context of increasing global financial integration and behavioral finance. Using monthly data from June 2007 to June 2024, this research constructs and tests the validity of a South African Fear and Greed Index, adapted from CNN’s U.S.-centric index, to better capture the unique dynamics and contribute to an alternate sentiment index for an emerging market. Employing the Diebold and Yilmaz (DY) connectedness framework, this study quantifies both static and dynamic spillover effects via a vector autoregression-based variance decomposition model. The results reveal significant bidirectional sentiment transmission, with the U.S. acting as a dominant net transmitter and South Africa as a net receiver, along with notable cross-country effects closely linked to the global economic trend. Spillover intensity escalates during periods of global economic stress, such as the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings highlight that the USA significantly influences South Africa and that the adapted SA Fear and Greed Index better accounts for South African market conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of risk and financial management→Same topicMarket Dynamics and Volatility→French-language works237,207→