MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411568354 · doi:10.1134/s2075111725700080

Physiological and Biochemical Peculiarities of Woody and Herbal Invasive Plant Species under Stress Conditions

2025· article· en· W4411568354 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
А. С. Лукаткин, Elvera Sh. Sharkaeva

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Biological Invasions · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAllelopathy and phytotoxic interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvasive speciesBiologyWoody plantStress (linguistics)Fight-or-flight responseIntroduced speciesBotanyTraditional medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We studied the short-term effect of stress factors (high and low temperatures, drought) on lipid peroxidation (LPO), the activity of antioxidant enzymes (catalase, ascorbate-peroxidase (APO)), and the state of the photosynthetic apparatus (PSA) according to the characteristics of chlorophyll fluorescence (ChF) in leaves of young plants of woody and herbaceous invasive species—box elder (Acer negundo L.), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.), Canadian fleabane (Erigeron canadensis L.), and wild cucumber (Echinocystis lobata L.), spreading intensively in the Republic of Mordovia. It was shown that the responses were different in woody and herbaceous invasive plants. Herbaceous species showed higher resistance to abiotic stressors as compared to woody ones. It has been suggested that the resistance of the antioxidant system and PSA of alien species to environmental stress factors is one of the reasons for the high invasive ability of these plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of Biological InvasionsSame topicAllelopathy and phytotoxic interactionsFrench-language works237,207