MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411569335 · doi:10.3390/jmmp9070208

A Feasibility Study on UV Nanosecond Laser Ablation for Removing Polyamide Insulation from Platinum Micro-Wires

2025· article· en· W4411569335 on OpenAlexafffund
Danial Rahnama, Graziano Chila, Sivakumar Narayanswamy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSurface Roughness and Optical Measurements
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsPolyamideNanosecondMaterials scienceAblationLaser ablationPlatinumLaserOptoelectronicsComposite materialOpticsChemistryEngineeringAerospace engineeringOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents the optimization of a laser ablation process designed to achieve the precise removal of polyamide coatings from ultra-thin platinum wires. Removing polymer coatings is a critical challenge in high-reliability manufacturing processes such as aerospace thermocouple fabrication. The ablation process must not only ensure the complete removal of the polyamide insulation but also maintain the tensile strength of the wire to withstand mechanical handling in subsequent manufacturing stages. Additionally, the exposed platinum surface must exhibit low surface roughness to enable effective soldering and be free of thermal damage or residual debris to pass strict visual inspections. The wires have a total diameter of 65 µm, consisting of a 50 µm platinum core encased in a 15 µm polyamide coating. By utilizing a UV laser with a wavelength of 355 nm, average power of 3 W, a repetition rate range of 20 to 200 kHz, and a high-speed marking system, the process parameters were systematically refined. Initial attempts to perform the ablation in an air medium were unsuccessful due to inadequate thermal control and incomplete removal of the polyamide coating. Hence, a water-assisted ablation technique was explored to address these limitations. Experimental results demonstrated that a scanning speed of 1200 mm/s, coupled with a line spacing of 1 µm and a single ablation pass, resulted in complete coating removal while ensuring the integrity of the platinum substrate. The incorporation of a water layer above the ablation region was considered crucial for effective heat dissipation, preventing substrate overheating and ensuring uniform ablation. The laser’s spot diameter of 20 µm in air and a focal length of 130 mm introduced challenges related to overlap control between successive passes, requiring precise calibration to maintain consistency in coating removal. This research demonstrates the feasibility and reliability of water-assisted laser ablation as a method for a high-precision, non-contact coating material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Manufacturing and Materials ProcessingSame topicSurface Roughness and Optical MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207