MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411570816 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1619353

Associations between childhood maltreatment and overt aggression in depressed adolescents: the mediating effect of alexithymia and insomnia

2025· article· en· W4411570816 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jiawei Wang, Lewei Liu, Lili Zhao, Qianqian Wu, Tiantian Sun, Xuemei Wei, L. Xia, Feng Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlexithymiaAggressionToronto Alexithymia ScaleCTQ treePsychologyClinical psychologyInsomniaMajor depressive disorderHamdDepression (economics)PsychiatryPoison controlInjury preventionMedicineDomestic violenceAnxietyMood

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Overt aggression may be associated with childhood maltreatment (CM), insomnia, and alexithymia, but the underlying mechanisms of these associations have not been fully explored in adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). Therefore, the present study aimed to deeply analyze the relationships between overt aggression and CM, insomnia, and alexithymia in adolescents with MDD, to reveal the mediating mechanisms, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinical interventions. Methods From January 2024 to March 2025, this study included 251 adolescents with MDD. The Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS), the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), the Insomnia Severity Index Scale (ISI), and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) were used to assess the adolescents’ overt aggression, depression, CM, insomnia, and alexithymia. Additionally, we employed the PROCESS macro program to examine the mediating role of insomnia and alexithymia between CM and overt aggression. Results The prevalence of overt aggression in adolescents with MDD was 66.1%. The regression analyses showed that age (Beta = -0.761, t = -2.967, P = 0.003), depression (Beta = 0.183, t = 2.676, P = 0.008), CM (Beta = 0.132, t = 4.048, P < 0.001), and alexithymia (Beta = 0.092, t = 1.990, P = 0.048) were independent correlates of overt aggression. When CTQ subscale scores involved in the regression model, age (Beta = -0.829, t = -3.257, P = 0.001), depression (Beta = 0.184, t = 2.618, P = 0.009), emotional abuse (Beta = 0.372, t = 4.081, P < 0.001), and insomnia (Beta = 0.170, t = 2.054, P = 0.041) were independent correlates. Moreover, alexithymia and insomnia played a chain mediating role between CM and overt aggression. Conclusion The risk of overt aggression is significantly higher in depressed adolescents and is significantly associated with CM, insomnia, and alexithymia. Additionally, insomnia and alexithymia may play a mediating role between CM and overt aggression. Given these findings, comprehensive interventions for depressed adolescents with adverse childhood experiences, insomnia, and alexithymia, should be emphasized in clinical practice to effectively reduce their risk of overt aggression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PsychiatrySame topicChild Abuse and TraumaFrench-language works237,207