MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characterization of external cross-talk from silicon photomultipliers in a liquid xenon detector

2025· article· en· W4411578787 on OpenAlexafffund
D. Gallacher, A. De St. Croix, S. Bron, B. Rebeiro, Thomas McElroy, S. Al Kharusi, T. Brunner, C. Chambers, B. Chana, Z. Charlesworth, Eamon Egan, M. Francesconi, L. Galli, P. Giampa, D. Goeldi, Sylvain Lavoie, J. Lefebvre, X. Li, C. Malbrunot, P. Margetak, N. Massacret, S. C. Nowicki, H. Rasiwala, Kurtis Raymond, F. Retière, Sandhya Rottoo, L. Rudolph, Xiao Shang, Marc‐André Tétrault, T.I. Totev, S. Viel, Nguyen V. H. Viet

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Physical Journal C · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British ColumbiaSimon Fraser UniversityQueen's UniversityUniversité de SherbrookeCarleton UniversityTRIUMFMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence FundAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsSilicon photomultiplierXenonDetectorPhotomultiplierCharacterization (materials science)SiliconMaterials scienceNuclear physicsOpticsPhysicsOptoelectronicsScintillator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Light-only Liquid Xenon experiment (LoLX) employs a small-scale detector equipped with 96 Hamamatsu VUV4 silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) submerged in 5 kg of liquid xenon (LXe) to perform characterization measurements of light production, transport and detection in xenon. In this work, we perform a novel measurement of the “external cross-talk” (ExCT) of SiPMs, where photons produced in the avalanche escape the device and produce correlated signals on other SiPMs. SiPMs are the photodetector technology of choice for next generation rare-event search experiments; understanding the sources and effects of correlated noise in SiPMs is critical for producing accurate estimates of detector performance and sensitivity projections. We measure the probability to observe ExCT through timing correlation of detected photons in low-light conditions within LoLX. Measurements of SiPM ExCT are detector dependent; thus the ExCT process is simulated and modelled using the Geant4 framework. Utilizing simulations, we determine the average transport and detection efficiency for ExCT photons within LoLX, a necessary input to extract the true ExCT probability and detector independent photon emission intensity. For an applied overvoltage of 4 V and 5 V, we measure a mean number of photons emitted into LXe per avalanche of $$0.5^{+0.3}_{-0.2}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and $$0.6^{+0.3}_{-0.2},$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> respectively. Using an optical model to describe photon transmission through the SiPM surface, this corresponds to an estimated photon yield inside the bulk silicon of $$20^{+11}_{-9}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>20</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>9</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>11</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> and $$25^{+12}_{-9}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>25</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>9</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>12</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> photons per avalanche. The relative increase in intensity of SiPM ExCT emission between 4 and 5 V is consistent with expectation for the linear increase of gain with respect to overvoltage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe European Physical Journal CSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207