Predicting Cryptocurrency Prices: A Machine Learning Approach for Investment Strategies and Market Trend Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cryptocurrencies have emerged as significant players in the financial market, attracting substantial investments and interest. However, the market's high volatility and unpredictability pose challenges for investors in forecasting price movements and achieving profitable investments. This study aims to develop a model that predicts future cryptocurrency prices, providing valuable insights for investment strategies and market trend analysis. The proposed model utilizes advanced methods such as feature selection and a combination of Random Forest Regression and Linear Regression techniques to analyze historical price data and generate real-time forecasts. The study employs the CoinGecko API to retrieve cryptocurrency data and presents users with a Streamlit web application for interacting with the prediction system. Users can log in, select a cryptocurrency, and obtain future price predictions based on the chosen machine learning algorithm. The architecture of the program involves fetching data from the API, applying machine learning algorithms, and displaying the results through a user interface. By comparing the accuracy of Linear Regression and Random Forest Regressor, the study aims to identify the most effective approach for cryptocurrency price prediction. The proposed model seeks to provide a robust framework for analyzing data and generating actionable insights in the dynamic cryptocurrency market, empowering investors to make informed decisions and actively participate in the financial discovery journey.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".