MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Streamlining tuberculosis detection with foundation model-based weakly supervised transformer

2025· article· en· W4411588707 on OpenAlexaff
Zsolt Bedőházi, András Biricz, N Foster, Yusen Eason Lin, István Csabai

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers in Biology and Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Research, Development and Innovation OfficeNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal
KeywordsTransformerComputer scienceFoundation (evidence)TuberculosisArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMedicineEngineeringElectrical engineeringPathologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Traditional microscopy-based diagnostics are labor-intensive and error-prone, while automated deep learning models often require detailed expert annotations and intensive preprocessing, limiting their scalability. To address these challenges, we propose a weakly supervised approach for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in microscopy images, leveraging UNI, a foundation model pretrained on millions of pathology images. Our method encodes microscopy images as sequences of patch-level embeddings using UNI and applies a Transformer encoder to classify each image using only image-level labels, without requiring detailed annotations. This framework minimizes preprocessing, reduces annotation costs, and enhances scalability. Our model was trained and tested on large, diverse datasets, achieving high PR-AUC scores (0.943-0.974), demonstrating strong performance and robustness. This success highlights the potential of our approach, which introduces two key innovations not previously explored for automated TB detection: leveraging cross-domain transfer learning by applying UNI for MTB detection and using a weakly supervised approach that relies only on image-level labels, significantly reducing the annotation burden compared to traditional fully supervised methods. Our results underscore the feasibility of foundation models in TB diagnostics and broader medical imaging applications. This scalable, weakly supervised approach demonstrates promising experimental results, highlighting its potential to significantly reduce annotation requirements and streamline TB detection workflows, particularly relevant to resource-limited settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputers in Biology and MedicineSame topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207