Promosi Kesehatan: Perilaku Hidup Bersih dan Sehat (PHBS) pada Lansia di Puskesmas Cebongan Salatiga
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Masih banyak rumah tangga yang belum menerapkan Perilaku Hidup Bersih dan Sehat (PHBS), khususnya pada lansia. Penerapan PHBS pada lansia dinilai belum memadai, yakni sebesar 53,34%, terutama disebabkan oleh rendahnya tingkat kebersihan diri. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kesadaran dan promosi penerapan Perilaku Hidup Bersih dan Sehat (PHBS) pada lansia di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Cebongan. Melalui kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat, telah dilakukan edukasi tentang Perilaku Hidup Bersih dan Sehat (PHBS) kepada 31 lansia melalui kegiatan ceramah, demonstrasi, dan tanya jawab. Hasil pra kegiatan menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar peserta telah menerapkan PHBS, namun pemahaman tentang dimensi PHBS masih perlu ditingkatkan. Setelah kegiatan, peserta menunjukkan antusiasme yang tinggi dalam menerapkan PHBS, khususnya dalam praktik cuci tangan. Berdasarkan data kuesioner, sebanyak 30 dari 31 lansia (96,8%) menyatakan selalu menerapkan PHBS, namun perlu dilakukan analisis lebih lanjut. Kesimpulannya, kegiatan edukasi diperlukan untuk meningkatkan kualitas kesehatan lansia
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".