Biological Reasoning with Reinforcement Learning through Natural Language Enables Generalizable Zero-Shot Cell Type Annotations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq) has reshaped biomedical research, enabling the high-resolution characterization of cellular populations. Yet cell type annotation, a process typically performed by domain experts interpreting gene expression patterns by manual curation or with specialized algorithms, remains labor-intensive and limited by prior knowledge. In addition, while reasoning large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance on mathematics, coding and general-reasoning benchmarks, their potential in scRNAseq analyses remains underexplored. Here, we investigate the advantages and limitations of employing DeepSeek-R1-0528, a recently developed open-source 671B-parameter reasoning LLM, for zero-shot scRNAseq cell type annotation. We find that DeepSeek-R1 prompted with a ranked list of 10 differentially expressed marker genes per cluster of single cells outperforms both its reasoning-enhanced, non-reasoning equivalent (DeepSeek-V3-0324) and GPT-4o in cluster-level annotations. At the level of single cells, DeepSeek-R1 prompted with the top 500 expressed genes in a cell outperforms its non-reasoning counterpart DeepSeek-V3, illustrating test-time scaling for bioinformatics tasks through natural language. Running DeepSeek-R1 in zero-shot classifier mode, with a prompt that presents a broad catalogue of cell type labels to choose from, improves its performance and generalizability across different datasets. On data curated by the expert model scTab (termed in-domain data), the DeepSeek-R1 classifiers perform better than the expert model scGPT and on par with the specialized cell genomics LLM C2S-Scale-1B, but lag behind scTab. On out-of-distribution data unseen by the two expert models, DeepSeek-R1 and its classifier versions generalize better and outperform the other models in the majority of the evaluated datasets. Notably, DeepSeek-R1 supports its cell type calls with interpretable textual biological rationales underlying its reasoning, providing a learning opportunity for researchers. Nevertheless, peak annotation performance remains modest, highlighting the intrinsic complexity of scRNAseq cell type annotation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".