MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411599597 · doi:10.1109/iotm.001.2400140

Vehicle Sound Recognition Assistance in IoT Systems for Hearing-Impaired Drivers

2025· article· en· W4411599597 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Magazine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Noise and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSound (geography)Internet of ThingsSpeech recognitionComputer scienceHearing impairedAudiologyInternet privacyAcousticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hearing-impaired drivers face significant challenges in detecting critical auditory cues, such as emergency vehicle sirens, essential for safe driving. This article presents an advanced IoT-based sound recognition system designed to enhance situational awareness for these drivers. Audible signals are recognized and transformed into alerts displayed in the dashboard. Our approach involves preprocessing audio data to extract 23 features. We normalize these features and evaluate multiple Machine Learning and Deep Learning models for their classification performance. The top five models, selected based on their performance metrics, are then combined into an ensemble model using majority voting to improve accuracy and robustness. Our dataset comprising 1500 audio samples enabled us to achieve a final accuracy of 94.2% with the ensemble voting approach. These results demonstrate a significant performance in sound classification accuracy compared to individual models, indicating the effectiveness of our ensemble approach. This research provides a valuable step towards developing more accessible and safer driving assistance systems for individuals with hearing impairments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it