The structural features and immunological role of biomphalysins in the snail Biomphalaria glabrata
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biomphalysins are β-Pore Forming Toxins (β-PFT) identified in the planorbid Biomphalaria glabrata that belong to the aerolysin-like protein family. Despite potentially diverse biochemical activities, very few eukaryotic aerolysin-related proteins have been extensively studied. Most of the data refers to their discovery in genomes or to transcriptional activity. The involvement of biomphalysins in the immune response of Biomphalaria glabrata has been studied previously, especially regarding biomphalysin 1, which can bind and kill Schistosoma mansoni mother sporocysts. However, the repartition of biomphalysin 1 protein in B. glabrata has yet to be defined. The transcriptional behavior of the 22 other biomphalysin genes following immune challenge also remains uncharacterized. Therefore, herein, we investigate for the first time the tissular distribution of biomphalysin 1 (and 2) in B. glabrata by histological and cytological analyses through immunofluorescence approaches, notably unveiling unexpected tissue location that are involved in biomphalysin 1 synthesis. Structural predictions of the 23 members of the family have been updated using predictions based on aminoacyl spatial pair representation (AlphaFold2), highlighting unique features of the small lobe. In addition, mass spectrometry-based proteomic data more precisely predicted the regions of post-translational cleavage of biomphalysin 1. Transcriptional activity of the biomphalysin genes was explored, after which the plasmatic presence of the biomphalysin proteins was investigated in naive and S. mansoni-infected snails. The ability of native biomphalysin 1 (and 2) to bind several cell types was also investigated and correlated with the lytic ability of plasma toward the exposed cells, highlighting the central role occupied by biomphalysin 1 (and 2) in the humoral immunity of B. glabrata.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".