MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Moesziomyces antarcticus MMF1 Has a Role in the Secretion of Mannosylerythritol Lipids

2025· article· en· W4411608914 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuze Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroorganisms · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsGlycolipidSecretionBiologyUstilagoYeastMutantBiochemistryExtracellularIntracellularATP-binding cassette transporterCell biologyMicrobiologyGeneTransporter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mannosyl erythritol lipids (MELs) are glycolipid biosurfactants produced by Ustilaginomycete yeasts. The MEL biosynthetic pathway has been characterized in Ustilago maydis where a putative transporter encoded by MMF1 is required for the secretion of the glycolipid surfactant to the extracellular space. The anamorphic yeast Moesziomyces antarcticus is a prolific producer of MELs, but the mechanism of MEL secretion is less well characterized than in U. maydis. Homologous recombination was employed to generate a disruption of the MMF1 gene in M. antarcticus JCM10317. This mutation did not prevent the intracellular accumulation of MEL species but did result in significantly reduced secretion of the conventional MEL-A, MEL-B and MEL-C species detectable by thin-layer chromatography. However, the mutant strain did secrete a glycolipid species that is distinct from conventional MEL-A/B/C and similar to a glycolipid secreted by MMF1 mutant strains of U. maydis and Pseudozyma tsukubaensis. Despite the defect in MEL secretion displayed by the M. antarcticus strain harbouring a disrupted MMF1 gene, these cells did not display a significant defect in growth or cell morphology. The findings of this investigation provide evidence that M. antarcticus MMF1 encodes a transporter required for the secretion of MELs but not required for MEL synthesis or cell growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroorganismsSame topicFungal and yeast genetics researchFrench-language works237,207