MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411611259 · doi:10.1061/jsendh.steng-13830

Flexural Behavior and Design of Prestressed Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete Beams: Failure Mode and Ductility

2025· article· en· W4411611259 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexural strengthDuctility (Earth science)Structural engineeringMaterials scienceFailure mode and effects analysisPrestressed concreteMode (computer interface)Composite materialEngineeringComputer scienceCreep

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) is well-known for its ultra-high compressive strength and sustained postcracking tensile ductility, making it an attractive choice for the construction of modern structures. However, prestressed UHPC members often fail quickly after crack localization accompanied by reinforcement rupture, which shows limited failure warnings (i.e., relatively small ductility, nearly invisible cracking, and negligible compressive damage). In contrast, UHPC members can also be designed to allow the gradual strain hardening of reinforcement to compensate for the load loss due to crack localization, and the final failure is attributed to the gradual crushing of UHPC prior to reinforcement rupture. Failure after gradual strain hardening is desirable since it brings warning signs through high ductility, visible cracks, and controlled spalling. To achieve a resilient structural design of UHPC members, this study aims to develop design methods to avoid early failure after crack localization and promote failure after gradual strain hardening. This study first establishes a three-dimensional finite-element analysis (FEA) model to simulate the flexural behavior of prestressed UHPC beams, which is validated against seven existing experimental beams. Then, parametric analyses are conducted to assess the influence of five key aspects, including the steel rebar-to-prestressing strand ratio, the postyield hardening of mild steel rebars, the pretensioned stress of prestressing strands, the tensile behavior of UHPC, and the web width to bottom flange ratio. Additionally, the authors propose a design method to predict the failure mode of prestressed UHPC beams, which can be used to guide the design of reinforcement configuration and promote ductile structural behavior. In particular, a threshold reinforcing ratio for mild-steel rebar is proposed to design for failure after gradual strain hardening.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it