MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411613610 · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2025.06.008

Effects of interval exercise and diurnal variation on blood biomarkers for sport-related concussion: A crossover cohort study

2025· article· en· W4411613610 on OpenAlexafffund
Linden C. Penner, Jason Tabor, Joel S. Burma, Heather Godfrey, Jean‐Michel Galarneau, Jennifer Cooper, Mohammad Ghodsi, Cheryl L. Wellington, Chantel T. Debert, Carolyn A. Emery, Jonathan D. Smirl

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of science and medicine in sport · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Children's Hospital
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInternational Olympic CommitteeCanada Research ChairsNFL Foundation
KeywordsConfidence intervalConcussionMedicineInterquartile rangeContext (archaeology)Crossover studyInternal medicineCohortPhysical therapyPoison controlPathologyInjury preventionBiologyPlacebo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Preliminary investigation of exercise and diurnal effects on neurofilament light, glial fibrillary acidic protein, ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 and total tau. METHODS: Plasma biomarkers were assayed from blood drawn before, during, immediately following, and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48-h following three exercise conditions completed on a cycle ergometer (control [stationary], moderate intensity interval training and high intensity interval training). Participants with no prior concussion history completed each condition randomized four weeks apart. DESIGN: Observational, crossover cohort. RESULTS: Two-hundred-and-ninety-three plasma specimens from 10 participants (7 female, 3 male; median age 23.79 years (interquartile range: 21.38, 25.12)) demonstrated transient decreases in neurofilament light immediately following moderate (-1.11 pg/mL, 95 % confidence interval: -2.08 to -0.13, p = 0.03) and high intensity interval exercise (-1.48 pg/mL, 95 % confidence interval: -2.54 to -0.42, p = 0.01). Glial fibrillary acidic protein also decreased immediately following moderate (-16.47 pg/mL, 95% confidence interval: -28.88 to -4.06, p = 0.01) and high intensity interval exercise (-22.85 pg/mL, 95 % confidence interval: -30.25 to -15.45, p < 0.01), returning to control levels by 1 h post-exercise. Total tau declined throughout the day across all conditions on average (8 h: -1.15 pg/mL, β: 0.63, 95 % confidence interval: 0.44 to 0.89, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings highlight potential considerations for future sport-related concussion biomarker investigations collecting acute post-injury data in a sports context, as exercise may have immediate transient effects, and diurnal variations may affect plasma concentrations. Future research is needed to examine blood biomarkers affected by exercise and sport-related concussion in populations with consideration for concussion history, age, and sex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of science and medicine in sportSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207