MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411613827 · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114300

Design and optimization of quinary high entropy alloy systems with single-phase microstructures from conventional alloy systems

2025· article· en· W4411613827 on OpenAlexafffund
Joseph Agyapong, Yanbo Su, Jatin Chhabra, Aleksander Czekanski, Solomon Boakye-Yiadom

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials & Design · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Entropy Alloys Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of ManitobaMcMaster University
KeywordsQuinaryMaterials scienceAlloyMicrostructureHigh entropy alloysMetallurgyPhase (matter)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-entropy alloy (HEA) discovery has traditionally relied on theoretical stability criteria and random compositional permutations, often overlooking practical manufacturability and experimental viability. In this study, we present a constraint-driven alloy design framework that enables early-stage development of manufacturable quinary equiatomic HEAs derived directly from conventional engineering alloys. Beyond the classical thermodynamic screening parameters, our framework incorporates manufacturability filters: melting point compatibility (ΔT mc ), atomic solubility index, ( S ¯ ) and vapor pressure parameter (P v ), targeting additive manufacturing (AM) processability. A flexible web-based platform was developed, allowing users to input any conventional alloy and generate new HEA systems according to the described criteria. We applied this framework to 15 industrial prototype alloys, generating over 60 quinary HEA candidates, many of which are previously unreported. One predicted composition, CuFeNiMnAl, was successfully fabricated using Directed Energy Deposition (DED), exhibiting a fine-grained FCC structure, high hardness (∼560 HV), and high densification (∼7.1 g/cm 3 ) relative to its parent alloy, nickel aluminum bronze. This experimental validation confirms the framework’s ability to deliver novel, manufacturable HEAs derived from real alloy systems. By integrating manufacturability constraints into early-stage design, this work provides a scalable, data-efficient pathway to application-ready HEAs, bridging computational discovery with industrial implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.752
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials & DesignSame topicHigh Entropy Alloys StudiesFrench-language works237,207