MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411617936 · doi:10.51847/zplycooaom

10.51847/ZPLycOoAOM

2000· article· en· W4411617936 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and biological activity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharacterization (materials science)Combinatorial chemistryAntibacterial activityMetalChemistryStereochemistryOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceNanotechnologyBacteriaBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The metal(II) complexes of 4-amino-2,6-dichloropyrimidine (L) have been synthesized and characterized by IR and electronic spectroscopies, percentage metal, magnetic moments, conductance and melting point measurement{where M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu and Zn}.The ligand coordinates to the metal ions in the ratio 2L: 1M, through the nitrogen atoms of the pyrimidine ring and the amino group.The electronic spectra and room temperature magnetic measurements were consistent with the adoption of a 6-coordinate octahedral geometry for Fe(II) and Ni(II) complexes while Mn(II), Cu(II),Co(II) and Zn(II) complexesassume a 4-coordinate square-planar/ tetrahedral geometry.The conductance measurements in DMSO showed that the Fe(II) complex was covalent, the Ni(II) complex wasa 1:1 electrolyte and the remaining metal complexes were 1:2 electrolytes respectively.The in-vitro antibacterial studies revealed that the Co(II) complex had a broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus with inhibitory zones range of 11.0-25.0mm proving its potential usefulness as a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8580.826

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicSynthesis and biological activityFrench-language works237,207