Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is to evaluate the effect of Haloperidol drug in changes of tests tissue and spermatogenesis process.40 pregnant female rat of vistar race were studied empirically in 5 groups with 8 members and 8 male infants out of each group were tested randomly.There was not medicine care on control group.Control group recived 1 cc distilled water as drug's solvent.Empirical group received Haloperidol drug 12/5, 25, 50 mg/kg every day for 28 days orally.Hemat imeteric was performed when time period was over and after drug prescription.Hematosmples were gathered in order to measure serum concentration of hormones: LH, FSH and testosterone by radio immunocy method.According to results, 25, 50 mg/kg Haloperidol consumption has led to lose weight and testosterone reduction while, has increased LH, FSH concentration.To evaluate on testis tissue showed some obvious reduction in cell sequence of spermatogenesis by dose of 25, 50 mg/kg.weight-average of testes had not meaningful difference between control group and empirical group who had received drug.Eating 50 mg/kg Haloperidol reduced erume concentration of testosterone hormone and attenuate production process of spermatogenesis cells, whereas it increases serum concentration of LH, FSH hormones and this show remedy activity by hippofiz to exudte gonadoteropins.Hence, if this drug is used in long time, generation efficiency will bedecreased.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.962 | 0.849 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".