Bibliographic record
Abstract
The attachment and belonging to the environment in the traditional neighborhood life has always contributed to a sense of responsibility in the residents relative to each other and the city and establishing social partnerships.Today, major changes have occurred in the lifestyle and social communications especially among the neighbors.This has resulted in indifference and separation of the citizens from each other and also from the events that occur within the city and the neighborhood.The increasing process of weakening social relations will eventually lead to social disconnectedness.Since the traditional neighborhoods in Iran enjoyed a built-in enclosure and hierarchy and such enclosure had a significant impact on the residents' sense of place attachment, this question comes to mind that whether the enclosed form of a residential complex can also affect the level of the inhabitants' sense of place attachment similar to the traditional neighborhoods?Hence, in this paper we have attempted to examine the lives of the residents of the residential complexes such as Shahrake Ekbatan and Shahrake Gharb in the Greater Tehran to come up with a clear answer to the raised question.Undoubtedly, the research result may affect the process of design and development of residential settlements in accordance with the needs of the indigenous peoples.We used the Williams & Vask questionnaire to this end.We dispensed the questionnaire with 12 benchmark questions about the extent of the sense of place attachment among 210 residents of both towns.Based on the obtained results, the inhabitants of Shahrake Ekbatan showed a higher sense of place attachment than the residents of the Shahrake Gharb.In other words, since the t-statistic is larger than the absolute value of 1.96 at 95 percent confidence level; and also since the error level is smaller than 0.05 at 95 percent confidence level; so there is a significant difference between the level of enclosure and the residents' sense of place attachment.Therefore, the highly enclosed form of a residential complex begets a higher sense of place attachment among the residents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.979 | 0.969 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".