Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study deals with the documentation of traditional knowledge of some Phenorogames in Mulkhow valley, District Chitral.A total of 60 taxa were documented as being used by ethic group for different purposes.Out of these, 39 species were herbs, 12 shrubs and 9 trees.Maximum taxa are belonging to Asteraceae 11(18.33%),Papilionaceae, Apiacae, and Solanaceae come to next with 5(8.33%) species in each, followed by Lamiaceae 3(5%), leguminaceae, Irridaceae and Plantaginaceae 2(3.33%) species in each, the remaining families contain 1 species in each.The taxa are used for different purposes such as medicine, traditional food, fodder, fuel, timber, thatching etc.Out of the total, 34 species were used as medicinal purposes, 6 species were used as traditional food, and 6 species were used as fodder.The remaining species were used for fencing, timber, fire wood, harvesting material etc. Majority of plant parts were used in the form of decoction and were used orally.Unsustainable utilization of taxa, soil erosion, over grazing, and poor harvesting method seem to be potential threats for the flora.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.999 | 0.976 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it