Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Suburbanization or as it is called today, informal settlement, is the consequence of rapid urbanization and transfer to socioeconomic paradigm of industrialization.Swift and unbalanced physical development of cities has been followed by undesirable economic, social and skeletal consequences.One of the effects and consequences of inharmonious urban physical development includes suburbanization and informal settlement.Nowadays, thousand million people of the world especially in developing countries live in unauthorized and disturb residences and under poor economic, social and environmental conditions.According to the report released by the UN, informal settlements (suburbanization) have been identified as the main challenge of the third millennium.On the whole, in the world one out of every six individuals lives in informal settlements.About 2 billion persons of the urban population of the world will live in such residences until the year 2030.In this research, first, the concept of informal settlement and different theories about the subject of research has been studied.Later, the corresponding problems with informal settlements and characteristics of these residences will be explained in detail.At the end, the approaches for intervention with informal settlements are studied from the beginning through the present time.The main goal of this research is to describe the respective problems with this type of residences and recognition of the intervention approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.995 | 0.986 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it