MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411618157 · doi:10.51847/lutfuqyipc

10.51847/lUTFUQyiPC

2000· article· en· W4411618157 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBurnoutPsychologyMedicineClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present research aims to study effectiveness of Shafi Abadi's multi-axial pattern on reducing occupational burnout of primary school teachers in District One of Tehran.Research's statistical population includes 100 number of teachers at primary stage in District One of Tehran from which 30 number were selected as sample volume following performing relevant tests.This was a semiexperimental study with pre-test and post-test design with control group.This research's statistical population consisted of 100 number of primary school teachers in District One of Tehran from which 30 teachers were selected by simple random sampling method.Selected teachers were randomly replaced at research's different condition (experiment group= 15 persons and control group=15 persons).Experiment group participated in Shafi Abadi's multi-axial training pattern plan following performing pre-test for both groups, but no training plan was applied for control group and post-test for both groups was applied at last session.So, findings required for evaluating research issue were collected and they were analyzed by software SPSS and Covariance test.Covariance analysis showed that teaching Shafi Abadi's multiaxial pattern influences all the occupational burnout's components and teachers' occupational burnout can be reduced through this pattern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8330.729

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knit→Same topicHealth and Well-being Studies→French-language works237,207→