MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411618166 · doi:10.51847/nnrrk0bv7r

10.51847/NNRrk0bV7R

2000· article· en· W4411618166 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpowermentServant leadershipEmployee empowermentLeadership styleStyle (visual arts)ServantManagementPsychologySociologyPolitical scienceBusinessPublic relationsEngineeringArtVisual artsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to review on effect of leadership style of the (authentic and servant) on employee empowerment was performed in 2015 branches of National Bank of Kerman.Research method in terms of purpose is applied and in terms of data collection method is descriptive -survey.The statistical population included 320 personals of all employees of the National Bank of Kerman, of which by using Cochran formula and simple random sampling of 175 persons as sample size was considered.Data collection method based on standard questionnaires of authentic leadership wovlmboa et al. (2008), servant leadership Barboto and Wheeler (2006) and employee empowerment Robbins and others (2002) was performed.After collecting the questionnaires investigating data and testing hypotheses by using method of structural equation modeling with the help of Smart PLS 2 software in two parts of measurement model and the structural part was done.Finally research findings a positive and significant impact of authentic and servant leadership style on employee empowerment in the study population, means National Bank of Kerman was confirmed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9410.941

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207