MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411618181 · doi:10.51847/zt3f8hn1t0

10.51847/zt3f8hn1T0

2000· article· en· W4411618181 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current study examines the reasons of the fulfilment of believers in the world and the Hereafter, according to the text of Chapter 23 of Holy Quran; because a believer can have both physical and spiritual health.A believer is of a conscious existence and likewise he has a sense of hatred of sin due to his internal and external senses.The believer, whose faith is authentic, always attends to the Lord, and the practice of faith is an inseparable part of his existence.And consequently the attributes of a healthy and pious man emerge in him.The believer believes in resurrection, both in his mind and in his tongue, for this reason, the worldly life is worthless to him, and thus he keeps himself away from the futility and deviations that endanger the health of the soul and the body.The men of belief are familiar with the duties of servitude.And the one who performs his religious duties and since the nature of these duties is positive, they are led as such to physical and spiritual health.The believer who has touched and enjoyed the pleasure of faith, i.e. has felt the permissible pleasures and touched the greatest pleasure of faith, namely, the proximity to God, finds his desire for sin disappears.This research has been conducted to present a religious and clear pattern for having a healthy body and soul.Accordingly, this research work is to examine and compare the exegetical books.If the content of the Qur'an and the findings of this research are put into practice, one can well see its success, as we see in Quranic commands in the communities that follow them in real life conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9810.936

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207