Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation is to determine the relationship between the physical combination and anaerobic power.The female student athletes of the Shomal-Amol university had formed the statistic body of the investigation that were 50 persons.First the individual characteristics of the samples registered and the sizes of anthropometric and physical form included: length, weight, BMI, fat percent, the circles of crag, arm, shin, Renee, forearm, the epicondyle of the forearm and the epicondyle of the Renee were measured.Anaerobic power was measured by RAST test.The peiersoun correlation coefficient was used for correlation between variants and kolmogorov -smirnov test was used in order to have natural datum and for certainty of the natural contribution of the testees.Average and sannital standard digression of the testees: 20.84±1.23 year, length: 161.84 ±6.42 cm, weight 59.04 ± 9.36 kg and BMI 22.54 ± 3.30.These present findings of research showed that there isn't any meaningful relationship between anaerobic power with physical form and athletes, specially, the ones of the explosive filed such as: volleyball must deposit more concentration on anaerobic system of their bodies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.906 | 0.918 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".