Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to review the effectiveness of effective communication training on the self-esteem and general health of women visiting the counseling centers of the district 1 of Tehran.This is a semi-experimental with a pretest, posttest and a control group.The statistical population of this study was comprised of women visiting the counseling centers of district 1 of Tehran city.50 of these women showed interest in participating in effective communication training courses.Out of these 50 women, 30 of them were selected as the research sample using simple random sampling method and were divided into an experimental group and a control group.The general health questionnaire (GHQ28) and Aizeng self-esteem questionnaire were the tools used in this research.The independent variable in this research was the effective communication training and the effective communication training course offered to the samples in the experimental group was 10 2-hour sessions.After the training program ended, the posttest was done for the both groups.The results of the analysis of hypotheses using covariance analysis method showed that effective communication training has affected the general health and self-esteem of women participating in the courses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.940 | 0.906 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".