Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study aims to review the role of creating Aras Free Zone in the amount of social capitals of resident families in the domain of this zone.In terms of research method, this study is a survey.The information of this study has been collected using a research-made questionnaire.The statistical population of this study is comprised of families living in area of Aras Free Zone.According to the 2011 census, there were 2621 families.335 families were selected using the cluster sampling method with the help of Cochran's formula.These families were asked to fill out the questionnaire.The content validity of the questionnaire is face validity and the reliability of this questionnaire has been calculated by the Cronbach's alpha method.In order to identify the difference between the means of the variables, t-test has been used.The obtained data has been analyzed using the SPSS software.The results of this analysis are as follows: given the result that the significance of the social capital variable has been lower than 0.05, it can be concluded that there is a significant relationship between social capital and creation of Aras free zone.This means that the social capital of the families in this area has been increased after creating Aras free zone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.846 | 0.755 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".