Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study is aimed to study the relation of early maladaptive scheme with students' mental health; therefore‚ a number of 88 students were chosen through normal multi_stage random sampling method and three types of questionnaires of demographic‚ general health‚ and early maladaptive scheme of young were distributed among the samples and Cronbach's alpha was measured using SPSS to examine schemes of instability/ abandonment‚ distrust and ill-treatment, emotional deprivation‚ defects / shame‚ social isolation / alienation‚ dependence and incompetence‚ vulnerability to losses‚ selfundeveloped/ occupied‚ failure‚ entitlement/ grandiosity‚ continue and insufficient self-discipline‚ obedience‚ sacrifice‚ emotional inhibition‚ unrelenting standards/ extreme reproach‚ and scales of physical symptoms‚ anxiety symptoms‚ sleep disorder‚ social function and symptoms of depression.The result showed‚ the closer the coefficient to one‚ it would be more suitable.In the study‚ an acceptable level of reliability of questionnaires was reached regarding the research variables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.937 | 0.913 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".