MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411618245 · doi:10.51847/vcvmlqgtyi

10.51847/vCVmLqGTYI

2000· article· en· W4411618245 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreativityPsychologyTraining (meteorology)Medical educationCreative thinkingMathematics educationApplied psychologyPedagogySocial psychologyMedicineGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study has been conducted aiming to determine the effectiveness of training positive thinking skills on the creativity level of the students in district 5, Tehran.This study is quasiexperimental with pretest -posttest control group.The population of this study involved all female students of secondary high schools in the nonprofit schools of district 5 education in Tehran; which of this population one school was selected using random cluster sampling method and of the selected schools, two high schools were selected using random sampling.In this study, Abedi creativity questionnaire was used to assess creativity.The study was performed so that first pretest was implemented for both groups, then provided positive thinking sessions for the experimental group for 8 sessions of 90-minute duration, but no intervention was carried out for control group.After completion of training for the experimental group, both groups were put under posttest creativity test.Likewise, the research required data were collected in this way and analyzed with covariance test; findings showed that positive thinking skills significantly affect the creativity and its dimensions (innovation, flexibility, elaboration and fluency) and enhance the creativity of the students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8340.737

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knit→Same topicEducation and Critical Thinking Development→French-language works237,207→