Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the present study is to investigate the effect of ethical leadership relations on the employees' deviant behavior with the moderating role of organizational envy.The population included 157 employees in Petro Sina Arya Oil & Gas Company, Tehran.The present study used a simple random sampling method and 111 people were selected as the sample size using Cochran's sample size formula.The researcher conducted a factor analysis and used triple questionnaires for data collection.The structural relations model was used for data analysis in this study.Content validity and Cronbach's alpha were used to determine the validity and reliability of the questionnaires.Its value was 0.812, 0.88, and 0.81 for the ethical leadership questionnaire (Brown et al., 2005), the employees' deviant behavior questionnaire (Bennett and Robinson, 2000), and the organizational envy questionnaire (Jourablou, 2013).The LISREL statistical software was used for data analysis, hypothesis testing, and doing other analyses for this study.The results indicated that the managers' ethical leadership reduces the employees' organizational envy and deviant behavior in the organization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.914 | 0.893 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".