Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early maladaptive design can increase anxiety in teenagers.The aim of this study is to determine the Communication study between early maladaptive design and anxiety in both male and female guidance Students in the Bojnord city.The design of this research is descriptive-correlational and the study sample includes all male and female guidance students from district 5 of Bojnord city enrolled in the academic year of 2012-13.Data collection tools include 4 measures of Demographic Questionnaire, The short version of Young schemas questionnaire (YSO-SF) and Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS).Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis of data (P<.001)show that a significant positive Communication study exists between the early maladaptive design and general anxiety in guidance students.Furthermore, this research has determined that, there is a relation between early maladaptive design and physical signs of anxiety in male and female students of high schools.Moreover, according to the results of this study,There is a significant relation between the early maladaptive design and mental signs of anxiety.As a result, decreasing early maladaptive design in students helps reducing their anxiety as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.837 | 0.738 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".