MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411618363 · doi:10.51847/pgrs6q35gd

10.51847/pGRs6Q35gD

2000· article· en· W4411618363 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOrganizational Leadership and Management Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarketingAdvertisingBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to investigate the role of sensory marketing in investigating the type of drinking glass on the customer's choice (the case study of Iran, India and the United Arab Emirates).The research method of this study was applied in terms of objective and correlational in terms of method.The population of the study was unlimited.Data were collected among cafe shop customers of India, the United Arab Emirates, and Iran by using questionnaire, and 200 questionnaires were distributed among the customers that 179 samples were collected as acceptable samples.According to the nature of the data, the non-parametric statistical methods were used to test the hypotheses and to evaluate the difference between the two groups, non-parametric test of Mann-Whitney was used, and to examine the difference among the three groups, Kruskal-Wallis test with SPSS software was used.The results show that the type of glass had impact on the customer familiarity with drink only in olive and dark cherry colors and respondents have more familiarity with olive color in cherry glass and with dark cherry color in simple glass.The impact of glass on preferred time to use drink was not confirmed.In investigating the effect of type of glass on the preferred age to use drink, difference was confirmed only in the case of neon yellow color.In addition, the effect of type of glass on drink pleasure in any of the colors was not confirmed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9920.990

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicOrganizational Leadership and Management StrategiesFrench-language works237,207