MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411618396 · doi:10.51847/kwbksvxn6m

10.51847/KwBKsvXn6M

2000· article· en· W4411618396 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCompetency Development and Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerceptionPsychologyKnowledge managementApplied psychologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the triple managerial skills (perceptual, human and technical) among physical education managers of Fars province and demographic characteristics (age, work experience, management experience, educational level, athletic experience, field of study, gender).The research method was descriptive and conducted through field study.A researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data for this study which its validity was calculated (789.0%) by professors of sports management and its reliability was also found 85.0%.The results showed that the technical skill with average score of 39.12 was of the highest importance and perceptual skill with a mean of 23.12 was of the lowest importance from the perspective of subjects.In addition, there is no relationship between some demographic characteristics and skills of managers and there is only significant negative correlation between managerial experience and technical skills of managers.Multivariable regression results suggest that management experience; educational level and work experience have a direct and positive relationship with dependent variable.So it can be concluded these variables had a significant role in the triple management skills.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8910.881

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicCompetency Development and EvaluationFrench-language works237,207