Bibliographic record
Abstract
Today, knowledge as a critical source for heritage preservation, learning new things, solve the problems, has the highest capability and core competence and crate new portucnites for individuals and organizations to advance knowledge and knowledge based on age.The main objective of this study was to investigate and identify the status of knowledge sharing among employees shiraz Gas company .theresearch is descriptive survey.The population of this research included all the official staff of shiraz in 1395 that the number of gas companies 230.The sample size used according to Cochran formula was based on Morgan table 140 account.To collect related to the study, standard questionnaire was used sharing.To assess the reliability of collected data from questionnaires distributed coefficient were calculated using Cranach's alpha coefficient is 70%.The results showed a significant level of research, knowledge sharing variable in the average level in shiraz Gas company and also the significance level of research, ranging human infrastructure in in shiraz gas company at a high level than the average.The results shoes that the significant level of research infrastructure variable process in shiraz Gas company at the lower level of the average.As well as variable information and communication technology infrastructure in shiraz Gas company is an intermediate level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.996 | 0.990 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".