Advanced Synthetic Strategies toward Ginkgolide Diterpenoids: Total Synthesis of (±)-Ginkgolide C and Formal Syntheses of (±)-Ginkgolides A and B
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ginkgolides are highly oxygenated diterpenes isolated from Ginkgo biloba that exhibit potent anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties. Their compact hexacyclic architecture─featuring multiple contiguous stereocenters, a spirocyclic core, and a rare tert -butyl group─presents a formidable challenge in synthetic organic chemistry. Herein, we report the first total synthesis of ginkgolide C ( 3 ), the most structurally complex member of this family, completed in 26 steps from commercially available materials. The synthesis is guided by a functional group-driven strategy that enables the convergent construction of the polycyclic core through key diastereoselective carbon–carbon bond formations, selective oxidations, and late-stage epoxide-opening lactonizations. In parallel, the formal syntheses of ginkgolides A ( 1 ) and B ( 2 ) were accomplished via interception of a late-stage intermediate in 17 steps, the shortest route to these targets reported to date. This work provides a unified synthetic platform for accessing the ginkgolide family and offers new opportunities for the synthesis and biological evaluation of related analogues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".