MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Facies stacking patterns in modern carbonate peritidal settings and their sequence-stratigraphic implications

2025· article· en· W4411627508 on OpenAlexaff
John M. Rivers, Robert W. Dalrymple

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth-Science Reviews · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyFaciesCarbonateSequence (biology)Sequence stratigraphyStackingPaleontologyGeochemistryPetrologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ‘shallowing-upward’ (parasequence) motif has long dominated the understanding of bed-scale carbonate cycles and, ultimately, sequence-stratigraphic models for platform-interior deposits of the rock record. To evaluate the viability of the shallowing-upward assumption, a review of mid- to late-Holocene coastal carbonate successions from many “classic” peritidal settings was undertaken. This assessment shows that the simple shallowing-upward assumption is largely unsupported by the aggregate of modern-systems observations. Tidal flats generally do not prograde directly into lagoons to create muddy shallowing-upward cycles, and lagoons are not observed to prograde over their own protective shoal barriers to create grainy shallowing-upward cycles. Instead, transgressive deposits comprise an important component of carbonate depositional successions, forming deepening-upward motifs, where cycle-base tidal-flat and lagoonal remnants are overlain by a ravinement surface, signifying the passing of a transgressing carbonate barrier, and then are overlain by open-platform deposits. Overlying this, regressive deposits, where present, are represented by lagoonal abandonment and grainy shoreface progradation capped by strandplains, with overlying accommodation only for thin, discontinuous, intertidal mud flats and their subtidal drainage channels in inter-ridge swales. These observations indicate that the construct of the parasequence is less useful than that of a high-order sequence containing transgressive and regressive components. The implications of these observations and interpretations are wide-ranging and have generated the need for updated sequence-stratigraphic models for coastal carbonates based on modern coastal systems, and with which the rock record can be compared. These models are meaningfully different from models currently in use with respect to predictions of large-scale subsurface connectivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarth-Science ReviewsSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207