MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411628205 · doi:10.1016/j.geits.2025.100333

Integrated bidirectional electric vehicle battery network for sustainable communities: A planning framework

2025· article· en· W4411628205 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGreen Energy and Intelligent Transportation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsBattery (electricity)Electric vehicleComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringBusinessEngineeringPower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transition towards sustainable and net-zero energy communities has become imperative in addressing the challenges of climate change and ensuring a resilient energy future. This work proposes an innovative planning framework through the development of an integrated bidirectional electric vehicle (EV) battery storage network for net-zero communities. The proposed framework is intended for neighborhood planning and integrates a bidirectional charging infrastructure that allows EV batteries to seamlessly contribute to the grid during periods of high demand or store excess renewable energy during off-peak hours. To analyze various EV microgrid integration scenarios, a combined Matlab-Simulink and EnergyPlus simulation environment is proposed to simulate EV battery networks in neighborhood settings. This study examines state of charge (SoC), and energy exchange characteristics based on specific user behaviors and charging scenarios. A neighborhood archetype of 48 single-family detached houses is considered along with five EV use profiles (EVPs) for the demonstration of the proposed method. For the considered neighborhood, in winter, EVPs have eliminated the peak loads during early morning hours (1 am - 6 am) by discharging stored energy. In spring, loads exceeding the base load are observed from 1 am to 10 am, with all EVPs discharging energy until 9 am and then recharging during off-peak hours. Summer required strategic charging management, with EVPs supporting peak loads from 7 am to 6 pm. In the fall, EVPs discharged energy from 12:01 am to 6 am and recharged from 10 am to 6 pm. The study introduces the EVP peak support index facilitating real-time charging adjustments and incentivizing greater participation. By leveraging this index, smart charging systems can develop algorithms to control charging times based on grid needs, ensuring efficient energy distribution and enhanced grid stability. This framework offers a robust approach to scenario generation for energy and urban planners during the neighborhood planning stages predicting energy performance and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it