MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411628701 · doi:10.1103/t2w3-z3j3

Revealing isotropic abundant low-energy excitations in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>UTe</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> through complex microwave surface impedance

2025· article· en· W4411628701 on OpenAlexaff
Arthur Carlton-Jones, Alonso Suarez, Yun Suk Eo, Ian Hayes, Shanta Saha, Johnpierre Paglione, Nicholas P. Butch, Steven M. Anlage

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchArmy Research OfficeGordon and Betty Moore FoundationU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAlgorithmPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complex surface impedance is a well-established tool to study the super- and normal-fluid responses of superconductors. Fundamental properties of the superconductor, such as the pairing mechanism, Fermi surface, and topological properties, also influence the surface impedance. We explore the microwave surface impedance of spin-triplet <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:msub> <a:mi>UTe</a:mi> <a:mn>2</a:mn> </a:msub> </a:math> single crystals as a function of temperature using resonant cavity perturbation measurements employing a multimodal analysis to gain insight into these properties. We determine a composite surface impedance of the crystal for each mode using resonance data combined with the independently measured normal state dc resistivity tensor. The normal state surface impedance reveals the weighting of current flow directions in the crystal of each resonant mode. For <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <b:msub> <b:mi>UTe</b:mi> <b:mn>2</b:mn> </b:msub> </b:math> , we find an isotropic <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mrow> <c:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</c:mi> <c:mi>λ</c:mi> <c:mrow> <c:mo>(</c:mo> <c:mi>T</c:mi> <c:mo>)</c:mo> </c:mrow> <c:mo>∼</c:mo> <c:msup> <c:mi>T</c:mi> <c:mi>α</c:mi> </c:msup> </c:mrow> </c:math> power-law temperature dependence for the magnetic penetration depth for <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <e:mrow> <e:mi>T</e:mi> <e:mo>≤</e:mo> <e:msub> <e:mi>T</e:mi> <e:mi>c</e:mi> </e:msub> <e:mo>/</e:mo> <e:mn>3</e:mn> </e:mrow> </e:math> with <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <f:mrow> <f:mi>α</f:mi> <f:mo>&lt;</f:mo> <f:mn>2</f:mn> </f:mrow> </f:math> , which is inconsistent with a single pair of point nodes on the Fermi surface under weak scattering. We also find a similar power-law temperature dependence for the low-temperature surface resistance <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <g:mrow> <g:msub> <g:mi>R</g:mi> <g:mi>s</g:mi> </g:msub> <g:mrow> <g:mo>(</g:mo> <g:mi>T</g:mi> <g:mo>)</g:mo> </g:mrow> <g:mo>∼</g:mo> <g:msup> <g:mi>T</g:mi> <g:msub> <g:mi>α</g:mi> <g:mi>R</g:mi> </g:msub> </g:msup> </g:mrow> </g:math> with <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <h:mrow> <h:msub> <h:mi>α</h:mi> <h:mi>R</h:mi> </h:msub> <h:mo>&lt;</h:mo> <h:mn>2</h:mn> </h:mrow> </h:math> . We observe a strong anisotropy of the residual microwave loss across these modes, with some modes showing loss below the universal line-nodal value, to those showing substantially more. We compare to predictions for topological Weyl superconductivity in the context of the observed isotropic power laws and anisotropy of the residual loss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207