MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411632185 · doi:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100558

Pathway-Specific Polygenic Scores for Predicting Clinical Lithium Treatment Response in Patients With Bipolar Disorder

2025· article· en· W4411632185 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Psychiatry Global Open Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalDalhousie UniversityMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill University Health Centre
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Health and Medical Research CouncilDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungUniversity of Adelaide
KeywordsLithium (medication)Bipolar disorderInternal medicinePsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Polygenic scores (PGSs) hold the potential to identify patients who respond favourably to specific psychiatric treatments. However, their biological interpretation remains unclear. In this study, we developed pathway-specific PGSs (PS PGS ) for lithium response and assessed their association with clinical lithium response in patients with bipolar disorder. Methods Using sets of genes involved in pathways affected by lithium, we developed nine PS PGSs and evaluated their associations with lithium response in the International Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLi + Gen: N=2367), validated in combined PsyCourse (N=105) and BipoLife (N=102) cohorts. The association between each PS PGS and lithium response — defined both as a continuous ALDA score and a categorical outcome (good vs poor responses) — was evaluated using regression models, adjusted for confounders. A significant association was determined after multiple testing correction at p<0.05. Results The PGS for acetylcholine, GABA and mitochondria were associated with response to lithium both in categorical and continuous outcomes. However, the PGS for calcium channel, circadian rhythm and GSK were associated only with the continuous outcome. Each score explained 0.29%–1.91% of variance in categorical and 0.30–1.54% in continuous outcomes. A multivariate modelling combining PS PGS that showed significant associations in the univariate analysis (combined PS PGS ), has increased the R 2 to 3.71% (categorical) and 3.18% (continuous) outcomes. Associations for PGSs for GABA and circadian rhythm were replicated. Patients with the highest genetic loading (10 th decile) for acetylcholine variants were 3.03 times more likely (95%CI: 1.95– 4.69) to show a good lithium response (categorical outcome) than those in the lowest (1 st decile). Conclusion PS PGSs achieved predictive performance comparable to the conventional genome-wide PGSs, with the added advantage of biological interpretability using a smaller list of genetic variants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it